This condition was a bit convoluted and while it was correct,
it doesn't look it.
Move the '!' into the '==' so the intention is a bit clearer
and compiler doesn't complain.
Fixes #7
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
do {
pos = tpos; row++;
next_mline(&tpos, fm, fb, fa, ci.merger, mmode);
- } while (!(check_line(pos, fm, fb, fa, ci.merger, mmode)
- & CONFLICTED) == 0
+ } while ((check_line(pos, fm, fb, fa, ci.merger, mmode)
+ & CONFLICTED) != 0
&& ci.merger[tpos.p.m].type != End);
tpos = pos; row--;
do {